POLICY
& RESEARCH
Research Reports Iowa State University
(funded by The
Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture)
Manure and Nutrient Management Competitive Grants, past
and present (Researcher affiliation listed is for the period of the project
and may have since changed.)
Manure and Nutrient Management Competitive Grants, past
and present (Researcher affiliation listed is for the period of the project
and may have since changed.)
Agriculture Farming Systems Project at the
Allee Research Center, Newell, Buena Vista County, 3 years,
$73,968 (#88-09); Mark Honeyman,
ISU Outlying Research Centers; and A Comparison of Farming Systems at
Allee Research Center, Buena Vista County, 1 year, $19,850 (#91-36); Dean
Grundmann, ISU Agronomy Extension
The six-year project was established
by the ISU Ag and Home Economics Experiment station in 1987 and concluded
in 1992. Leopold Center funding included years two through five and
was issued under the two competitive grant numbers shown. The project
was designed to compare a petrochemical-based, high-tillage, low-management
cropping system; a ridge-till, reduced fertilizer and pesticide, high-management
system; and a rotational, low-pesticide, low-fertilizer conventional
tillage system. Overall, the study suggests that a complex cropping
system can compete economically if high management is applied and adequate
time is allowed for transition.
The Effects of Organic vs. Chemical Fertilizers
on Insect Pathogens, 3 years, $70,644 (#92-18); Les
Lewis, USDA-ARS, Midwest Area Corn Insects Research Unit, Ankeny
The project studied the effects
of various fertilizers (fresh cow manure, composted cow manure, and
urea) on potential black cutworm biocontrol organisms (nematode Steinernema
carpocapsae and fungus Beauveria bassiana). Results showed that S. carpocapsae
is more active in soils with no fertilizer or composted manure than
fresh manure or chemical fertilizer; B. bassiana is adversely affected
by fresh manure.
Manure Management Education and Demonstration
Project - Cedar County, 2 years, $4,000 (#92-19); Jerry
Long, Kenneth Muller, Greg Brenneman, ISU Extension
The project demonstrated an economical
on-farm testing kit to help farmers make environmentally sound management
decisions for manure application to agricultural land. The results of
the testing were compared with laboratory analysis to determine the
kit's accuracy.
Calibration of the Late-Spring Soil Test
for Manured Soils, 3 years, $75,000 (#92-28); Alfred
Blackmer, ISU Department of Agronomy
Iowa farmers cooperated at 111 sites
to calibrate the late-spring soil nitrate test on manured cornfields.
Results showed that the guidelines for using the late-spring test in
manured cornfields needed to be revised to decrease amounts of fertilizer
nitrogen recommended.
Animal Manure Utilization in Crop Nutrient
Management Planning: An On-Farm Demonstration with Selected Producers
in Northeast Iowa, 2 years, $30,000 (#93-10); Gerald
Miller, ISU Department of Agronomy
Cooperating farmers were instructed
in manure spreader calibration and other means for taking advantage
of manure's fertilizer value. All of the farmers who participated in
the program continued to take credit for more of the nutrient resources
available on their farms, with 70% increasing use of manure credits
and 30% increasing use of legume credits.
Effect of Tillage, Crop Rotation, and Innovative
Nitrogen and Pesticide Management Practices on Productivity, Sustainability,
and Water Quality, 3 years, $84,224, (#93-14); Rameshwar
Kanwar, ISU Department of Ag and Biosystems Engineering
In this project the effects of seven
nitrogen management practices on water quality were evaluated after
collecting data from 40 experimental plots. Project work included evaluations
of N application rates, strip and hay cropping systems, herbicide banding,
and late-spring nitrate test. Work was continued for an additional year
under grant project 97-60.
Mahaska County Livestock Manure/Crop Nutrient
Demonstration, 3 years, $31,995 (#95-05); Joe
Sellers, Mahaska County Livestock Management Committee, ISU Extension
The project was designed to improve
manure application methods on Mahaska County farms through on-farm demonstrations,
educational events, and evaluation of crop residue levels, soil nitrate
levels, cornstalk nitrate levels, and yields.
Animal Manure/Municipal Yard Waste Composting
Project in Wright County, 2 years, $30,000 (#96-06); Randy
Killorn and Don Wetterauer,
ISU Agronomy Extension
Responding to concerns about limited
landfill space and disposal of manure from confinement livestock production,
residents of Clarion linked with an area poultry producer to mix yard
wastes with animal manure to produce garden and flowerbed compost.
The State of Iowa has banned disposal of yard wastes
in the states sanitary landfills since January 1991. Many Iowa
communities are looking for alternative methods of disposing of yard
waste generated in the community. Some sort of composting operation
is a popular solution. Small, rural communities may lack the volume
of materials needed to efficiently operate a composting facility. However,
in these areas livestock manure may provide additional material to compost
successfully. In Wright County, Iowa, for example, the number of animal
confinement facilities has increased dramatically in the last several
years. The quantities of animal waste produced at these facilities often
equals or exceeds the amount of waste generated by the human community
in the area. Rural residents, farm and non-farm alike, are concerned
with the quantities of manure produced and the effect on their quality
of life.
The city of Clarion, in Wright County, Iowa was selected
for the project because of the high concentration of animal confinement
feeding facilities in the area and the strong interest and support of
the community. The city public works director was responsible for providing
a site for the compost piles and on-site management of the project.
Clarion Composting Project
The
initial compost windrow was about 12 feet wide, 8 feet high and 75 feet
long.These dimensions were large enough to hold in heat generated by
the compost and small enough to allow air infiltration. The size of
the windrow was also tailored to accommodate the equipment used for
turning the windrow. Yard waste and poultry manure were mixed in a 1:1
ratio on 22 May 1995. The moisture content of the poultry manure
was about 43% and provided the right amount of moisture for the compost
pile. Based on the characteristics of the pile during active composting
the ratio of materials was about right. We were able to keep the pile
at the proper temperature and there was very little odor. This indicated
that there was not an excessive amount of N in the raw materials, the
moisture content was good, and that there was adequate air infiltration
preventing anaerobic conditions. After 100 days the temperature of the
windrow was near ambient air temperature and the active phase of composting
was complete. The first batch of Clarion compost was moved to curing
pile and was made available for distribution. A second pile was initiated
in the fall of 1995 and in 1996 piles were again established in the
spring and the fall.
The composting project received good publicity by
the local newspapers and was well received by the local community. Several
field days were held which offered citizens the opportunity to learn
about compost and to haul the compost away for use.
Development of Guidelines for Swine Manure
Application in Corn for N Management, 3 years, $75,000 (#96-10);
Alfred Blackmer, ISU Department of Agronomy
This project was a continuation
of work to generate guidelines for site-specific use of swine manure
as corn fertilizer. The project used the late-spring soil nitrate test
and end-of-season cornstalk testing to gather data from more than 100
on-farm trials across Iowa.
Development of a Nutrient Balance for Iowa
for Evaluating and Targeting Sustainable Agriculture and Nonpoint Source
Control Programs, 1 year funding with work still underway, $13,900 (#96-63);
George Hallberg, University of Iowa Hygienic Laboratory
The goal of the project is to develop
a nutrient balance database for Iowa cropland on a county-by-county
basis. It is expected to provide a tool for statewide program targeting
and evaluation.
Education-based Incentive Program to
Enhance Long-term Adoption of Sustainable Nutrient and Pest Management-A
Demonstration with Farmers in Northeast Iowa, 2 years, $13,920 (#97-21);
Gerald Miller, ISU Department of
Agronomy
By equipping producers, particularly
early career farmers, with expertise in soil map reading, soil testing,
setting realistic yield goals, and other skills, this project's goals
are to provide a learning model for career-long return on farmers' time
investment. An important element of the program helps participants learn
by doing on their own farms.
It is widely recognized that improving the environmental
sustainability of agriculture will require producers to increase the
intensity of their management process, including the use of more detailed
information, analysis, planning and record keeping. For crop nutrient
and pest management (NPM), there are well-established management practice
refinements which publicly supported projects in Iowa have thoroughly
documented to reduce excess or untimely environmental loading of agricultural
chemicals, increase use of on-farm resources, and maintain or increase
profitability. In spite of their profitability, however, many farmers
are slow to adopt NPM practices and best results have been obtained
from special projects where staff provide one-on-one assistance and
education.
Public financial incentives for NPM were initially
established for water quality and environmental conservation projects
on a private sector expert assistance model rather than an educational
model. Producers receiving incentives hire crop consultants to "deliver"
NPM plans, scouting reports and recommendations. To date there is little
evidence that the incentive program have produced change in producers
long term attitudes about more sustainable management. This pilot project
is aimed at demonstrating an operational model for a cost effective
educational incentive that can be used on a large scale to cause change
in producers attitudes and approach to nutrient and pest management
planning. In its third year, it has already begun to have an impact
on NPM efforts in other projects in Iowa and elsewhere.
The NPM Incentive Education Program (NPMI) is a local
initiative developed by ISU Extension, NRCS staff and the advisory committee
of the Northeast Iowa Demonstration and Sny Magill Creek HUA projects.
It requires participating farmers to learn the basics of NPM by creating
plans and records for their own farms. Participants move through the
program in a series of workshops with a group of 8 to 10 other participants
and receive incentive payments for elements of planning completed.
Twenty producers enrolled during 1996 for a three-year
series of workshops beginning in crop year 1997(CY97). They are the
third group of participants in this pilot educational program. During
their first year, they have written and implemented nutrient/manure
management plans for their farms, and prepared end-of-year field and
economic records. Retention of participants in this group has been better
than in the initial groups, partially because they are more established
farmers, and also because workshop methods are being refined to better
meet the participants needs. Leopold Center funding provides incentive
payments for this group based on acres they have enrolled in the program.
The NPMI incentives are paid for performance of specific program components.
Outreach from the project has been very successful.
The projects biweekly NPM newsletter is designed to assist participants
with field scouting and timely field/pest management decisions. Circulation
of this newsletter has increased to many local producers who are not
active in the project but find it a useful tool to improve their management.
A number of other Iowa water quality projects are planning or in the
early stages of implementing NPM incentive education based on this model
project, and staff have provided training and materials for them. Presentations
about the NPM Incentive Education approach have also attracted attention
from water quality projects in other states.
Comparisons of baseline and annual surveys of participants
show that the program is effective in giving producers confidence to
manage fertility programs, rather than relying on suppliers. Participants
have adopted increased field scouting, reduced use of purchased fertilizers,
and improved manure management.
Impacts of Swine Manure Application and
Alternative N- Management Practices on Productivity, 1 year,
$29,460 (#97-60); Rameshwar Kanwar,
ISU Department of Ag and Biosystems Engineering
The project continued the work of
grant 93-14 at the ISU Northeast Research farm near Nashua, which focused
on the impacts of fertilizer and manure management practices on Iowa
surface and ground water. The work is intended to aid in development
of best management practices for swine manure and for overall nitrogen
management.
Manure Management (Animal Waste) Management Issue Team
Stu Melvin, leader - 1991-1995.
Included the following projects:
The Role of Animal Production in Agricultural
Sustainability in Iowa
Mike Duffy, Jim Kliebenstein,
Bob Jolly, Department of Economics, Iowa State University
Effects of Land Application of Liquid Swine
Manure on Soybean Yield and the Environment
Randy Killorn, Agronomy Extension,
Iowa State University
An Integrated Grain and Swine Production
Farm System Study
Stu Melvin, Dwaine Bundy, Steven
Hoff, Department of Ag and Biosystems Engineering; Dean Zimmerman, Department
of Animal Science, Iowa State University
Swine Hoops Systems Initiative
Mark Honeyman, Jim Kliebenstein,
Jay Harmon, Tom Richards, Don Lay
The initiative involves construction
of hoops and a scale model confinement facility at the Rhodes Research
Farm ($100,000, completed in fall of 1997); and an annual commitment
of $50,000/year for the next three years to support research on key
producer questions regarding comparisons of hoops and confinement operations.
Other questions surrounding the comparison of hoops and confinement
operations will be identified through meetings of producers and other
interested parties (first focus group meeting Jan. 13, 1998).
For more information, click
here (pdf-file).

|